313Blog - MIB tightens TV ratings norms, mandates 1.2 lakh metered homes for better representation

MIB tightens TV ratings norms, mandates 1.2 lakh metered homes for better representation

Posted on 28th Mar 2026

 

MIB notifies TV rating policy 2026: Slashes entry barriers, de-recognises  landing page viewership, ETBrandEquity

Existing agencies have been given a tighter timeline of six months to reach the 80,000 mark

The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (MIB) has overhauled the methodology for selecting television audience samples under its TV Ratings Policy 2026, tightening norms around the identification, scale, and rotation of metered homes in a move aimed at improving the credibility of India’s TV ratings system. 

The new framework, which will apply to rating agencies including the Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC), places the selection of metered homes—the households whose viewing behaviour is tracked—at the centre of measurement reform, addressing long-standing concerns over representativeness and manipulation.

 

The guidelines is a requirement for agencies to build their sample base on a rigorous establishment survey, designed to map India’s “TV universe.” This survey must capture not just the number of television households, but also their socio-economic profiles, viewing infrastructure, and distribution across platforms such as cable, DTH, OTT and connected TVs. 

 

Importantly, the survey must be conducted annually and cover a sample size at least ten times larger than the actual metered homes, ensuring that the panel selection is rooted in a statistically robust base. 

The policy mandates that the final selection of metered homes must reflect a balanced distribution across demographic and geographic segments, including age groups, gender, socio-economic classes, working status, and urban and rural markets. It further requires proportional representation across states, effectively pushing agencies to mirror India’s diverse viewing population rather than over-indexing on select markets.   

 

In a significant scale-up, the MIB has prescribed a minimum threshold of 80,000 metered homes within 18 months of registration, with a mandatory annual increase of 10,000 homes until the panel reaches 1,20,000. Existing agencies have been given a tighter timeline of six months to reach the 80,000 mark, signalling the government’s urgency in expanding the measurement base.   

Beyond scale, the guidelines introduce structural safeguards to prevent bias and tampering. Agencies are explicitly barred from including any households linked to broadcasters, advertisers, or advertising agencies in the metered sample, a provision aimed at eliminating conflicts of interest that have historically plagued the ratings ecosystem.  

The policy also introduces a dynamic panel management system. Agencies must deploy 10% additional metered homes beyond the required sample size, from which the final dataset will be randomly drawn, alongside the use of algorithms to detect and eliminate outliers exhibiting abnormal viewing behaviour. Additionally, at least 25% of metered homes must be rotated annually, with gradual monthly replacement to maintain continuity while ensuring freshness of data.   

Crucially, the guidelines require that viewing data be captured across all TV screens within a household, reflecting the shift towards multi-screen consumption and ensuring more comprehensive measurement of audience behaviour.  

The emphasis on transparency is equally pronounced, with agencies mandated to publicly disclose their methodology for selecting and rotating metered homes, as well as share anonymised datasets with the government. This is expected to open up the “black box” of ratings measurement, which has often been criticised for lack of visibility.

Taken together, the reforms signal a clear intent by the MIB to rebuild trust in television ratings by strengthening the statistical backbone of audience measurement. For broadcasters and advertisers, the changes could lead to more accurate audience insights, although the expanded panel size and continuous rotation are likely to increase operational complexity and costs for rating agencies.

Blog Index